What changes in a McKinsey Digital case?
The format does not change. You still open with a hypothesis, keep the structure MECE, and close with a recommendation the interviewer can repeat. What changes is the constraint set. Instead of share, price, and competitors, you are usually dealing with legacy systems, a build-versus-buy choice, a data foundation that is not ready, and a sponsor who wants a pilot on a date the architecture cannot support.
How to structure the first two minutes
- Restate the decision in one sentence, including the metric and the time box.
- State a hypothesis. "I suspect the constraint is data quality, not the model" is better than "let me look at everything."
- Lay out two to four branches that do not overlap. A typical digital case splits into value, architecture, operating model, and risk.
- Ask for the number that would confirm or kill the hypothesis. Do not tour the whole data pack.
The structure guide covers the same four beats for any firm. On a McKinsey Digital case, the first beat has to include the technical constraint, or the hypothesis is generic.
What a strong answer sounds like
A strong candidate names the decision owner, the value metric, and the thing that will slip. On a cloud or AI case that is usually one of: the data is not trustworthy, the operating model cannot absorb the tool, or the economics only work if a legacy system is retired. They quantify that constraint before they recommend a vendor.
Red flags are a framework recited from memory, a recommendation with no number, and treating "digital" as a strategy instead of a set of systems and people.
Practice
Run a McKinsey-style technology case before you read another framework. The Saudi telco case is a good first one: the network score improved while postpaid churn doubled, so a candidate who jumps to "coverage" misses the case. Browse the rest of the McKinsey case interviews after that.