Product & Growth · Product Strategy · Medium · 25-35 min
Streaming Platform — From Growth to Retention
Streaming Platform — From Growth to Retention is a medium Product & Growth product strategy case interview that runs 25-35 min. A global video-streaming service has saturated its core markets — subscriber growth has stalled and churn is rising. A strong answer works through 5 phases: Reframe the success metric; Diagnose churn drivers; Evaluate levers; Weigh content spend ROI; Recommend a focused set of moves with the trade-offs (e.g. ads vs premium positioning).
Last updated 2026-09-05
The brief
A global video-streaming service has saturated its core markets — subscriber growth has stalled and churn is rising. Leadership has relied on subscriber adds as the headline metric; now the game is retention, engagement, and revenue per user. You're asked how the strategy should change and where to focus.
How to approach it
- Reframe the success metric — from net adds to engagement, retention, and ARPU
- Diagnose churn drivers — content gaps, price sensitivity, password sharing, competition
- Evaluate levers — ad-supported tier, password-sharing crackdown, content efficiency, bundling
- Weigh content spend ROI — is more spend buying retention, and where
- Recommend a focused set of moves with the trade-offs (e.g. ads vs premium positioning)
What a strong answer does
- Shifts the goal from subscriber growth to engagement-driven retention and ARPU
- Treats content spend as an investment to be measured on retention, not volume
- Weighs the ad-tier / sharing-crackdown trade-offs against brand and churn
- Connects engagement (hours, completion) to retention causally
- Prioritizes a few high-impact moves over doing everything
Red flags interviewers score down
- Keeps chasing subscriber adds in a saturated market
- Treats content spend as inherently good with no ROI link
- Recommends an ad tier or sharing crackdown without weighing churn/brand risk
- Ignores engagement as the leading indicator of retention
Cases are written in each firm's style, written and reviewed by working consultants; they are not the firms' own published cases.