Accenture · Tech Consulting · Medium · 25-35 min
Canadian Bank Launching Consumer-Driven Banking
Canadian Bank Launching Consumer-Driven Banking is a medium Accenture tech consulting case interview that runs 25-35 min. Canada's consumer-driven banking framework is moving from policy to a live regime: customers will be able to share deposit and payment data with accredited third parties. A strong answer works through 5 phases: Separate provider obligations (let customers share their data out) from the commercial choice to be a recipient; Size the scrape problem; Choose participation: build a consent and API layer on the industry standard vs waiting for a vendor wrapper; Sequence read-access for deposits first; payments initiation and 'we pull competitors' data' only after consent works; Set the operating model.
Last updated 2026-09-05
The brief
Canada's consumer-driven banking framework is moving from policy to a live regime: customers will be able to share deposit and payment data with accredited third parties. A Big Six bank has 11M digital users and a patchwork of screen-scraping fintechs already pulling data with customer passwords. The retail CEO wants to be a day-one data provider and is tempted to also become an accredited recipient so the bank's app can pull balances from competitors. Screen scraping must die. You have 15 months and a delivery team that has never run a consent platform. Advise on scope, build vs scheme participation, and what goes live first.
How to approach it
- Separate provider obligations (let customers share their data out) from the commercial choice to be a recipient
- Size the scrape problem — fraud, password risk, broken journeys — as the reason to move, not only the regulation
- Choose participation: build a consent and API layer on the industry standard vs waiting for a vendor wrapper
- Sequence read-access for deposits first; payments initiation and 'we pull competitors' data' only after consent works
- Set the operating model — consent revocation, accredited-party monitoring, customer support — before the marketing launch
What a strong answer does
- Treats day-one provider compliance as mandatory and recipient strategy as a separate business case
- Kills screen scraping on a dated plan rather than running it in parallel forever
- Designs consent, revocation, and liability with the same care as the API
- Puts a narrow product live (balances and transactions) instead of a super-app
- Staffs support and dispute handling, not only engineering
Red flags interviewers score down
- Bundles 'become a fintech aggregator' into the compliance program with no economics
- Leaves screen scraping in place with no end date
- Ships write/payment initiation in the first release
- No design for a customer who revokes consent on a Friday night
Cases are written in each firm's style, written and reviewed by working consultants; they are not the firms' own published cases.