Bain · Tech Consulting · Medium · 25-35 min

PE-Backed Logistics Software Carve-out

PE-Backed Logistics Software Carve-out is a medium Bain tech consulting case interview that runs 25-35 min. A PE fund has carved a last-mile routing SaaS out of a global courier parent. A strong answer works through 5 phases: Frame the carve-out as a value-creation plan, not an exit-the-TSA project; Categorise the TSA workstreams; Identify which TSAs are critical-path and which can extend safely; cost of extension vs cost of urgency; Surface the engineering capacity reality; Land a sequenced 18-month exit plan with the build/buy/outsource decision committed for each workstream.

Last updated 2026-09-05

The brief

A PE fund has carved a last-mile routing SaaS out of a global courier parent. The new standalone — 180 staff, $40M ARR, 60% gross margin — has an 18-month TSA covering payroll, billing, ITSM, identity, and the data lake. The mandate is to become independently profitable in 24 months and double ARR in three years. You are the value-creation lead. Build vs buy vs outsource is the question on every TSA workstream.

How to approach it

  1. Frame the carve-out as a value-creation plan, not an exit-the-TSA project — what is the equity story in 36 months
  2. Categorise the TSA workstreams — strategic (build), commodity (buy), low-volume (outsource) — with explicit criteria
  3. Identify which TSAs are critical-path and which can extend safely; cost of extension vs cost of urgency
  4. Surface the engineering capacity reality — 180 staff, much of it product — and what the run-rate of TSA exit consumes
  5. Land a sequenced 18-month exit plan with the build/buy/outsource decision committed for each workstream

What a strong answer does

  • Anchors every TSA decision to the 36-month equity story — does this build durable differentiation or not
  • Distinguishes strategic systems (product data, routing engine, customer data) from commodity (payroll, ITSM) and applies different decisions
  • Quantifies the engineering opportunity cost of every 'we'll build it ourselves' answer
  • Flags identity and data-lake exit as the riskiest items and protects them in sequencing
  • Closes with a clear Monday list — what is locked in, what is being RFP'd this week, what is being negotiated for extension

Red flags interviewers score down

  • Decides build vs buy on each TSA in isolation, no link to the equity story
  • Builds commodity systems in-house and burns engineering capacity
  • Ignores TSA pricing — extension is sometimes cheaper than exit
  • Promises full exit in 18 months without naming what slips

Cases are written in each firm's style, written and reviewed by working consultants; they are not the firms' own published cases.

More Bain cases